Radical Eclecticity

I had the most interesting image in my head, just now. I pictured Maslow and the Buddha meeting on the street and getting to talking. In my head, it goes a little something like this:

Maslow: So, you’re the Buddha? It’s really great to meet you!

Buddha: Likewise.

M: It’s interesting, actually. We have very similar theories, you and I.

B: Not so much.

M: What do you mean? My hierarchy is just like your Second Noble Truth. You said that the origin of suffering is desire. I call it “need” in my writings.

B: Yes, that is very similar to the Second Noble Truth.

M: Then my work goes on to say that these needs stand in the way of self actualization.

B: They do.

M: Well then, we both advocate the same thing. Your Third Noble Truth deals with the cessation of suffering.

B: It does.

M: That leads to self actualization. Don’t you understand what I’m saying here?

B: I do.

M: Then what difference do you see? Where are we different in our views? “Need prevents self-actualization” seems pretty fundamental in both our theses. So what am I missing?

B: Everything.

M: What? I don’t understand what you’re saying! I need you to explain yourself!

B: I know. I don’t experience that need, though. Thus, it does not prevent my self-actualization.

M: Are you kidding? That need hasn’t been satisfied! There is no understanding between us! Right now you are creating a deficiency in my Esteem needs! I do not feel understood, respected, or accepted here!

B: Nor do I. The difference between you and I, however, is that you seek to correct that by satisfying the need, whereas I have chosen to no longer need it.

M: <mutters incoherently with much flailing of arms, impolite speech, and heightened blood pressure; then storms off>

B: It has been a pleasure to meet you.